Cheney Memoir Reveals 9/11 Building 7 Bet with Rumsfeld -- Rumsfeld Won
By Ginny Stoner | nworeporter.com
Image by Ed. | nworeporter.com
September 8, 2042
Even now in 2042, with nearly 41 years separating our glorious global oligarchy from its adolescent awakenings on September 11, 2001, new revelations about the events of that day continue to emerge.
Not surprisingly, the immediate effect was widespread skepticism, which showed a troubling escalation in the years that followed. The date has long been recognized as a critical turning point in our historic transition from an illusory free world to a delusory collective utopia.
The official explanation for the catastrophic events of that day was that two planes manned by terrorists caused the collapse of two buildings known as the Twin Towers, and that a third building known as Building 7 collapsed later as the result of fires.
The skepticism came to a head in 2021, after 96% of statisticians worldwide signed onto a petition declaring that "the probability of three buildings collapsing in a virtually identical manner, on the same day, without the benefit of controlled demolition, with or without plane crashes or fires, is so infinitely minute as to be, for all practical purposes, impossible."
Further debate about the official story was finally put to rest in 2022, with legislation providing for the indefinite detention of 9/11 skeptics in reeducation camps employing an "only believers leave" policy. The camps were filled to capacity until 2037, when an official reprieve was granted on the basis that it happened so long ago, it just didn't matter much anymore.
Ever since, the events of 9/11 have been informally recognized with a wink and nod as a well-orchestrated opera of useful deception that no one is inclined to admit to openly -- until now, that is.
Further debate about the official story was finally put to rest in 2022, with legislation providing for the indefinite detention of 9/11 skeptics in reeducation camps employing an "only believers leave" policy. The camps were filled to capacity until 2037, when an official reprieve was granted on the basis that it happened so long ago, it just didn't matter much anymore.
Ever since, the events of 9/11 have been informally recognized with a wink and nod as a well-orchestrated opera of useful deception that no one is inclined to admit to openly -- until now, that is.
In his latest memoir, Vicissitudes of Sociopathy, longtime Globalord power player Dick Cheney provides a tantalizing peek at the inside events leading up to 9/11, revealing that the collapse of Building 7 was, indeed, a controlled demolition -- as well as the subject of a $1 bet between Cheney and power pal Donald Rumsfeld.
"Everyone agreed we could sell the 'plane flies into building, building collapses' scenario. Granted, twice in a row was stretching it, but still, we were pretty sure we could make it fly, with the help of the media toadies and a handful of puppet engineers. After all, it's not like anyone had any precedent to compare it to.
"But when it came to Building 7, we all agreed we couldn't use a third plane. NORAD could only stand down for so long before they would look like absolute idiots, and we knew the whole world was going to be watching.
"A massive fire in the SEC offices was proposed, but there was concern that the firefighters would put it out too soon, before it had burned long enough. It turns out that concern was well justified.
"Rumsfeld proposed that we take down Building 7 with explosives, and blame it on office fires. I said there was no way the people would buy a third building collapse in one day, without anything to crash into it. We were at an impasse.
"It was touch and go for a long time, especially after the Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth finagled legislation to open up an investigation into the Building 7 collapse in 2014. But by the time that started to get really hairy, we had pushed through the reeducation camp legislation, solving the problem.
"I've got to hand it to Rumsfeld -- he's an amazing operative. I don't begrudge him that $1 at all -- he earned it."
***
Comments: